<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>onymous &#187; Movie Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://levi.nohakostudios.net/category/movie-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://levi.nohakostudios.net</link>
	<description>designed and coded by Levi Ong</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:42:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Public Enemies</title>
		<link>http://levi.nohakostudios.net/2009/07/public-enemies/</link>
		<comments>http://levi.nohakostudios.net/2009/07/public-enemies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://levi.nohakostudios.net/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Brief Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis:
Cinematography: 3/5
Relatively good camera angles and a lot of the scenes were beautiful, but the type of camera they used just didn&#8217;t sit well with me. It felt flat (rather similar to Miami Vice actually) and rather unsettling in a negative way. There were some scenes that looked good with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Brief Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis:</p>
<p>Cinematography: 3/5</p>
<p>Relatively good camera angles and a lot of the scenes were beautiful, but the type of camera they used just didn&#8217;t sit well with me. It felt flat (rather similar to Miami Vice actually) and rather unsettling in a negative way. There <em>were</em> some scenes that looked good with it, but they weren&#8217;t enough to convince me to give it another star.</p>
<p>Sound: 4/5</p>
<p>Not much to say here. One way to know if the sound is good is if you actually don&#8217;t notice anything wrong. And I didn&#8217;t notice anything wrong in this movie. Mostly. There was this one part that made me go &#8220;eh?&#8221; but that&#8217;s nitpicking.</p>
<p>Acting: 5/5</p>
<p>The acting was very good. It wasn&#8217;t all-round, but Johnny Depp more than made up for the shortcomings of the other actors. Depp made Dillinger <em>live</em>. There was character and there was depth. Christian Bale&#8217;s character was a little disappointing, given that it was essentially the same character as John Connor, which was the same character as Bruce Wayne. But that isn&#8217;t his fault: It&#8217;s the goddamned scriptwriters&#8217;. In all fairness, Bale made the most out of the cards (see what I did there?) he was dealt with. Perfect score. <span id="more-48"></span></p>
<p>Direction &amp; Script: 4.5/5</p>
<p>This was also a shining point in the movie. Not a single scene felt boring. Do you know how hard it is to pull that off? The pacing was just brilliant, and the directing was top-notch. Throughout the movie I kept wondering &#8220;What will happen next?&#8221;</p>
<p>The only reason why I didn&#8217;t give it full marks was the poor treatment of Bale&#8217;s character.</p>
<p>Overall: 4.125/5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://levi.nohakostudios.net/2009/07/public-enemies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
